In what can only be described as an Olympic-level display of verbal gymnastics, NBC\u2019s fact-checkers have revealed that Vice President Kamala Harris set a new record in political artistry during her debate with former President Donald Trump, racking up an impressive 29 lies in just 90 minutes. And honestly? The fact-checkers almost seemed impressed, even going so far as to say, \u201cShe\u2019s good at lying.\u201d\n\n\n\n

Now, political debates are not exactly known for their adherence to the truth\u2014after all, bending facts has been a key strategy for candidates since the dawn of democracy. But according to NBC, Harris brought the art of deception to new heights, leaving even the most seasoned spin doctors marveling at her performance.\n\n\n\n

NBC\u2019s fact-checkers were reportedly overwhelmed during the debate, as their meticulously calibrated \u201cLie-O-Meter\u201d\u2014a tool specially designed to measure political falsehoods\u2014began smoking halfway through Harris\u2019s first answer. \u201cIt was unprecedented,\u201d said one exhausted fact-checker. \u201cWe\u2019ve covered countless debates over the years, but we\u2019ve never seen the machine overheat like this. At one point, we had to reboot it just to keep up.\u201d\n\n\n\n

The first red flag came when Harris, responding to a question about the economy, confidently declared, \u201cThe Biden administration has single-handedly saved America from a recession.\u201d The fact-checkers quickly pointed out that this was a slight exaggeration, given the ongoing economic challenges and the fact that, you know, inflation exists. But that was just the beginning.\n\n\n\n

As the night went on, Harris\u2019s \u201ccreative\u201d relationship with the truth became the main event. Whether she was discussing Trump\u2019s rally sizes or his administration\u2019s environmental policies, Harris managed to stretch the facts in ways that would make a yoga instructor proud. NBC\u2019s team described it as \u201can impressive feat of misdirection,\u201d noting that by the end of the debate, viewers were likely too dizzy to know what was true anymore.\n\n\n\n

Harris\u2019s strategy was clear from the outset: whenever confronted with a difficult question or weak point in her own record, she deployed a mixture of personal attacks, irrelevant anecdotes, and, of course, a few well-placed fibs. It was the political equivalent of tossing a smoke bomb and disappearing into the mist.\n\n\n\n

Take, for example, the moment when she was asked about her 2019 presidential campaign, particularly her shifting stance on fracking. Rather than give a straightforward answer, Harris pivoted to talking about how she had never taken handouts from her wealthy father. While the fact-checkers noted that this was technically true, they also pointed out that it had absolutely nothing to do with the question at hand. \u201cIt\u2019s like she\u2019s mastered the art of answering a question without ever actually answering it,\u201d said one NBC analyst. \u201cIt\u2019s impressive in a frustrating kind of way.\u201d\n\n\n\n

But perhaps her greatest move of the night came during a discussion about abortion. When Trump was floundering with his answer on Roe v. Wade, Harris pounced, making an emotional appeal to women and accusing Trump of pushing \u201cTrump abortion bans\u201d across the country. While her passion was clear, NBC\u2019s fact-checkers quickly noted that the term \u201cTrump abortion bans\u201d was, well, not a thing.\n\n\n\n

\u201cHer ability to create completely new terms and then treat them like long-established facts is nothing short of remarkable,\u201d said one fact-checker. \u201cWe\u2019ve got to give her credit for that. It\u2019s like watching a magician pull a rabbit out of a hat\u2014except the rabbit isn\u2019t real, and neither is the hat.\u201d\n\n\n\n

To be fair, Harris wasn\u2019t the only one bending the truth that night. Trump, as usual, had his own share of \u201calternative facts\u201d to contribute to the conversation. From defending the size of his rally crowds to discussing debunked reports about immigrants in Ohio abducting and eating pets, the former president was in peak form, leaving fact-checkers scrambling to keep up\n\n\n\n

But according to NBC\u2019s tally, Harris edged out Trump by a significant margin. \u201cSure, Trump had his moments of exaggeration and bluster, but Kamala was on another level,\u201d said one analyst. \u201cIt\u2019s like she was playing chess, and Trump was playing checkers\u2014both were bending the truth, but she did it with style.\u201d\n\n\n\n

NBC\u2019s final report found that Trump, while certainly no stranger to falsehoods, had only racked up 15 notable lies during the debate\u2014nearly half of Harris\u2019s total. \u201cHe just couldn\u2019t keep pace with her,\u201d one fact-checker noted. \u201cIt\u2019s like he was trying to fight misinformation with a blunt hammer, while she was weaving a tapestry of half-truths and misdirections. She\u2019s good at lying, no doubt about it.\u201d\n\n\n\n

The audience, both in the debate hall and at home, was left reeling from the sheer volume of misinformation flying across the stage. Social media exploded with reactions, as viewers tried to make sense of what they had just witnessed.\n\n\n\n

\u201cDid Kamala just say Trump banned all abortions?\u201d one confused Twitter user asked. \u201cI feel like I missed something.\u201d\n\n\n\n

Another user tweeted, \u201cI\u2019m not even sure what\u2019s real anymore. Is this debate or performance art?\u201d\n\n\n\n

Even seasoned political commentators were left scratching their heads. \u201cI\u2019ve covered dozens of debates, but this one was\u2026 something else,\u201d said one CNN analyst. \u201cBy the end of the night, I wasn\u2019t sure if I was watching a political debate or an improv class where the only rule was \u2018make stuff up.\u2019\u201d\n\n\n\n

Despite NBC\u2019s fact-checking marathon, the Harris campaign remained unfazed by the revelations. In fact, they seemed to embrace the idea that Harris had taken some liberties with the truth, spinning it as a sign of her ability to \u201cadapt\u201d and \u201cconnect with voters.\u201d\n\n\n\n

A spokesperson for the campaign told reporters, \u201cLook, politics is all about storytelling. Sometimes that means adjusting the facts a little to make sure the bigger message gets across. Kamala is great at that, and it\u2019s why she\u2019s such an effective communicator.\u201d\n\n\n\n

When asked about the 29 lies NBC attributed to Harris during the debate, the spokesperson chuckled. \u201cTwenty-nine? That\u2019s it? Honestly, that\u2019s kind of low for a political debate. I think she could\u2019ve gone for 30.\u201d\n\n\n\n

As the dust settles from the Harris-Trump showdown, one thing is clear: political debates have become less about who tells the truth and more about who can spin the most convincing narrative. In this latest battle, NBC\u2019s fact-checkers may have labeled Kamala Harris as the night\u2019s most prolific liar, but her ability to wield those lies with precision and confidence is a skill that few can deny.\n\n\n\n

Whether voters will punish her for stretching the truth\u2014or reward her for doing it so convincingly\u2014remains to be seen. But for now, the Harris campaign seems perfectly comfortable with its candidate\u2019s new title: \u201cShe\u2019s good at lying.\u201d\n\n\n\n